<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Great American Novel Possible Anymore?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kriswrites.com/2009/07/03/is-the-great-american-novel-possible-anymore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kriswrites.com/2009/07/03/is-the-great-american-novel-possible-anymore/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R. Torgersen</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2009/07/03/is-the-great-american-novel-possible-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R. Torgersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=886#comment-314</guid>
		<description>I remember when I set up a blog -- of sorts -- in late 2001, after the 9/11 crisis.  Like a lot of Americans, I felt I had something to say on important matters, and I periodically updated the page until perhaps 2005, at which time I just stopped updating the thing.  And eventually took it down.

My sense was this: the number of blogs across the Internet had exploded to such a huge degree, mine felt utterly and totally lost in the &quot;noise&quot; so why should I bother?  It wasn&#039;t like I was getting a lot of traffic anyway.  The &quot;noise&quot; won.

I agree 100% that the diversity of information and entertainment available these days is, overall, a good thing.  But like you, I find myself profoundly annoyed that I don&#039;t have the time or the energy to properly absorb and digest it all.  There is simply too much.  Way too much.  And it&#039;s all being pushed at us so fast now!

Lately my instinct is to run away from it all and try to go back 20 years and erect a bubble wherein I can pretend that there are still only a handful of television channels, there is no internet, and things seemed both simpler and more common among lots of different people.

This is probably an unrealistic approach and I am unsure of my ability to remain disciplined enough to not check blogs and read the web as much as I&#039;ve grown accustomed to doing.

But I do wonder at how bad things will get -- in terms of social myopia -- before we stabilize.  Or will the funneling continue forever?  People channeling deeper and deeper, down into little micro-cliques via the world wide web and texting and chat rooms and so forth?

My wife already teases me that I&#039;m more comfortable being social on-line than I am in person.  I suspect she is correct, and that I&#039;m just part of what&#039;s happening all over the world: a new kind of isolated socialization where nobody is ever face to face: it&#039;s all aliases and blogs and MySpace and Facebook.

Sometimes I suspect that if civilization ever does fall -- electronically -- it will be the defeaning silence of the cyber-medium that will hit people the fastest.  People simply won&#039;t know what to do with themselves.  There will be massive cyber-withdrawal.  Depression.  Suicides?

Scary, but it does seem like once a person &quot;plugs in&quot; on a certain level, it&#039;s very difficult to &quot;unplug.&quot;

Sorry to rant.  Not sure where I am going with this now.

Very good -- and somewhat saddening -- article, KKR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when I set up a blog &#8212; of sorts &#8212; in late 2001, after the 9/11 crisis.  Like a lot of Americans, I felt I had something to say on important matters, and I periodically updated the page until perhaps 2005, at which time I just stopped updating the thing.  And eventually took it down.</p>
<p>My sense was this: the number of blogs across the Internet had exploded to such a huge degree, mine felt utterly and totally lost in the &#8220;noise&#8221; so why should I bother?  It wasn&#8217;t like I was getting a lot of traffic anyway.  The &#8220;noise&#8221; won.</p>
<p>I agree 100% that the diversity of information and entertainment available these days is, overall, a good thing.  But like you, I find myself profoundly annoyed that I don&#8217;t have the time or the energy to properly absorb and digest it all.  There is simply too much.  Way too much.  And it&#8217;s all being pushed at us so fast now!</p>
<p>Lately my instinct is to run away from it all and try to go back 20 years and erect a bubble wherein I can pretend that there are still only a handful of television channels, there is no internet, and things seemed both simpler and more common among lots of different people.</p>
<p>This is probably an unrealistic approach and I am unsure of my ability to remain disciplined enough to not check blogs and read the web as much as I&#8217;ve grown accustomed to doing.</p>
<p>But I do wonder at how bad things will get &#8212; in terms of social myopia &#8212; before we stabilize.  Or will the funneling continue forever?  People channeling deeper and deeper, down into little micro-cliques via the world wide web and texting and chat rooms and so forth?</p>
<p>My wife already teases me that I&#8217;m more comfortable being social on-line than I am in person.  I suspect she is correct, and that I&#8217;m just part of what&#8217;s happening all over the world: a new kind of isolated socialization where nobody is ever face to face: it&#8217;s all aliases and blogs and MySpace and Facebook.</p>
<p>Sometimes I suspect that if civilization ever does fall &#8212; electronically &#8212; it will be the defeaning silence of the cyber-medium that will hit people the fastest.  People simply won&#8217;t know what to do with themselves.  There will be massive cyber-withdrawal.  Depression.  Suicides?</p>
<p>Scary, but it does seem like once a person &#8220;plugs in&#8221; on a certain level, it&#8217;s very difficult to &#8220;unplug.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry to rant.  Not sure where I am going with this now.</p>
<p>Very good &#8212; and somewhat saddening &#8212; article, KKR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

