<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Business Rusch: Perfection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-14145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant. Pure gold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant. Pure gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Nilsen</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13978</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Nilsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So needed this post -- I read it several days ago and came back to read the comments today.  No one can afford to listen to feedback that makes her feel bad about her work; listening to negative feedback of any kind and taking it to heart is the surest road to writer&#039;s block and depression.  

There&#039;s a magic to constructive feedback that inspires me to make my story better and gives me new energy to write and revise, and that&#039;s what I listen for--that moment when someone says something that sparks an idea for a new scene or turn of phrase that will make my work-in-progress the best it can be.  Constructive feedback resonates with the recipient.  If it doesn&#039;t, then it&#039;s not constructive, and I ignore it as best I can.

I love the advice about setting a deadline to avoid the perfection trap.  I&#039;ve seen too many good writers get stuck on the flypaper of perfection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So needed this post &#8212; I read it several days ago and came back to read the comments today.  No one can afford to listen to feedback that makes her feel bad about her work; listening to negative feedback of any kind and taking it to heart is the surest road to writer&#8217;s block and depression.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a magic to constructive feedback that inspires me to make my story better and gives me new energy to write and revise, and that&#8217;s what I listen for&#8211;that moment when someone says something that sparks an idea for a new scene or turn of phrase that will make my work-in-progress the best it can be.  Constructive feedback resonates with the recipient.  If it doesn&#8217;t, then it&#8217;s not constructive, and I ignore it as best I can.</p>
<p>I love the advice about setting a deadline to avoid the perfection trap.  I&#8217;ve seen too many good writers get stuck on the flypaper of perfection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine Kathryn Rusch</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13967</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine Kathryn Rusch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you can write like Heinlein, Ken, you&#039;ll be successful. Readers are still hankering for more writers like Heinlein. Unfortunately, the inside-baseball side of sf has tried to scare all those folks off. So more power to you. And good luck with the fiction! Glad the post helped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can write like Heinlein, Ken, you&#8217;ll be successful. Readers are still hankering for more writers like Heinlein. Unfortunately, the inside-baseball side of sf has tried to scare all those folks off. So more power to you. And good luck with the fiction! Glad the post helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Wilhoite</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Wilhoite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At age 69, looking down the pipe toward the light, and trying to pick up where I left of more than 40 years ago, then with pencil in hand ... I needed to hear this, Kris. Critique group serving well for mechanical stuff, but not &quot;for feeling good&quot; about my writing. I&#039;ve been writing professionally for over 50 years, but most of it inside for clients and agencies. Rejuvenating the opportunity to write the fiction I&#039;ve been carrying around in my head for decades is one of the wonders of post-retirement. And if I write like Heinlein, so what?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At age 69, looking down the pipe toward the light, and trying to pick up where I left of more than 40 years ago, then with pencil in hand &#8230; I needed to hear this, Kris. Critique group serving well for mechanical stuff, but not &#8220;for feeling good&#8221; about my writing. I&#8217;ve been writing professionally for over 50 years, but most of it inside for clients and agencies. Rejuvenating the opportunity to write the fiction I&#8217;ve been carrying around in my head for decades is one of the wonders of post-retirement. And if I write like Heinlein, so what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine Kathryn Rusch</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13746</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine Kathryn Rusch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I love that. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I love that. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM Drummond</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Drummond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This echoes my epiphany of my MFA in Creative Writing that I wrote into my thesis. I realized that the same piece of writing elicited a wide array of responses from fellow students and professors, and I realized that I had vastly different opinions than other students.

What I put in my thesis was that readers have “filters” that they sieve what they read through. Those filters are made up of who the reader is, their experiences and education, their prejudices, etc. When a reader reads something, it goes through this filter. What is read often leaves bits of itself behind to color future reading, but sometimes it jars something loose or changes that person’s earlier perceptions.

This means that no two people will “filter” a story in the same way. In fact, one person may not evaluate a story the same way twice since the make-up of the that person’s filter is constantly changing.

This was one of the most valuable things I came away with from my MFA, but of course I forget it from time to time and take a critique or rejection personally. So thank you for your post. It’s an excellent reminder and a verification that I’m not alone in my outlook.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This echoes my epiphany of my MFA in Creative Writing that I wrote into my thesis. I realized that the same piece of writing elicited a wide array of responses from fellow students and professors, and I realized that I had vastly different opinions than other students.</p>
<p>What I put in my thesis was that readers have “filters” that they sieve what they read through. Those filters are made up of who the reader is, their experiences and education, their prejudices, etc. When a reader reads something, it goes through this filter. What is read often leaves bits of itself behind to color future reading, but sometimes it jars something loose or changes that person’s earlier perceptions.</p>
<p>This means that no two people will “filter” a story in the same way. In fact, one person may not evaluate a story the same way twice since the make-up of the that person’s filter is constantly changing.</p>
<p>This was one of the most valuable things I came away with from my MFA, but of course I forget it from time to time and take a critique or rejection personally. So thank you for your post. It’s an excellent reminder and a verification that I’m not alone in my outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remittance Girl</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13723</link>
		<dc:creator>Remittance Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to find the inability to produce perfection paralyzing. Especially in ending stories. Then I realized, if you don&#039;t end it, and get it out there, no one will have the delicious opportunity to tell you how bad it was. Or how good it was. Or anything at all. 

Just get it out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to find the inability to produce perfection paralyzing. Especially in ending stories. Then I realized, if you don&#8217;t end it, and get it out there, no one will have the delicious opportunity to tell you how bad it was. Or how good it was. Or anything at all. </p>
<p>Just get it out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Beck</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13561</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;But I’m sure all you writers out there have heard just such a critique. And many of you have taken it to heart. I know dozens of writers who quit writing because they couldn’t stand the pain they received from their peer-level writing workshop.&lt;/i&gt;

I think this was my mistake; I joined an online crit group WAY too early. Left me discouraged for a number of years. I still wrote some stuff, but I refused to submit it anywhere, convinced that it was all drek.

Live and learn.

As for doing my own crits on others&#039; work, I always, always, always prefaced any crit with something like, this is just my opinion, take what you think works/trash anything that doesn&#039;t. As you&#039;ve pointed out, it&#039;s all so very subjective, and also, the last thing I want to do is to discourage people from writing. How do I know if I&#039;m squelching someone who might someday sell lots of books, entertaining lots of people?

Not going to be me.

It&#039;s nice to see that my instincts on this were backed up by a long-time writer and editor like you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But I’m sure all you writers out there have heard just such a critique. And many of you have taken it to heart. I know dozens of writers who quit writing because they couldn’t stand the pain they received from their peer-level writing workshop.</i></p>
<p>I think this was my mistake; I joined an online crit group WAY too early. Left me discouraged for a number of years. I still wrote some stuff, but I refused to submit it anywhere, convinced that it was all drek.</p>
<p>Live and learn.</p>
<p>As for doing my own crits on others&#8217; work, I always, always, always prefaced any crit with something like, this is just my opinion, take what you think works/trash anything that doesn&#8217;t. As you&#8217;ve pointed out, it&#8217;s all so very subjective, and also, the last thing I want to do is to discourage people from writing. How do I know if I&#8217;m squelching someone who might someday sell lots of books, entertaining lots of people?</p>
<p>Not going to be me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see that my instincts on this were backed up by a long-time writer and editor like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristine Kathryn Rusch</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13554</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine Kathryn Rusch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. <img src='http://kriswrites.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pfeifer</title>
		<link>http://kriswrites.com/2012/06/27/the-business-rusch-perfection/comment-page-3/#comment-13537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pfeifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kriswrites.com/?p=8530#comment-13537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you very much.  For this, wading isn&#039;t a chore, it&#039;s an education.
MP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much.  For this, wading isn&#8217;t a chore, it&#8217;s an education.<br />
MP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
